Gadar 2
During the Indo-Pakistani War of 1971, Tara Singh returns to Pakistan to bring his son, Charanjeet, back home.
- Released: 2023-08-11
- Runtime: 165 minutes
- Genre: Action, Drama, Thrillers
- Stars: Sunny Deol, Utkarsh Sharma, Ameesha Patel, Simrat Kaur, Manish Wadhwa, Gaurav Chopra, Luv Sinha, Mir Sarwar, Rohit Choudhary, Rumi Khan
- Director: Anil Sharma
Comments
- austin-19993 - 31 December 2023
What was the hype all about? Avoid this crp
Thank god i dint spend money to watch this useless movie in theatre. It's playing on TV in New Years eve. Since had no other plans, thought what a nice movie to watch. An hour into the movie, i think sleeping would be much more worth than watching this piece of I dont know what. Just to launch his son, the director came up with an idea to screw up a good old film and make a non sensical sequel. No acting whatsoever. No plot too. Not sure anyone will even cast the actor and the actress after this.... just avoid this movie. Director has successfully ruined the Gadar brand just to launch his son. - riyanrehan - 22 October 2023
Cartoon
The film is very weak and the Romance between the youngsters is the quickest love story I have ever seen. The story is more focussed on ensuring the hate and propoganda is emphasised right from the beginning.
The characters do not fit in at all. No doubt this was a success in India as the Hindus love these type of flicks showing Muslims getting killed. Hopefully there will not be more sequels.
The characters are pointless and do not contribute to the movie with their rubbish acting.
Reminds me Tom and Jerry and has been characters who still think they are big.
Do not waste your time please.
Better to watch paint dry! - masudjmi - 12 October 2023
Completely boring and waste of time
The story and action is unrealistic.
The film in question offered a mix of highs and lows, leaving audiences divided in their assessment. One undeniable positive was Sunny's action sequences, which emerged as the standout element of the production. The sheer energy, skill, and charisma he brought to his character's physical feats injected a palpable excitement into the viewing experience. His seamless blend of martial prowess and on-screen presence showcased his status as an action star, and these moments undoubtedly left a lasting impression on the audience.
On the other hand, the storyline of the film faced criticism for its lack of realism. Viewers found themselves grappling with scenarios that stretched the boundaries of believability, often requiring a suspension of disbelief that proved challenging. While cinematic narratives often demand a degree of imagination, the extent to which this film strayed from the realm of possibility left some viewers questioning the coherence and coherence of the plot. This disconnection from reality, unfortunately, detracted from the overall engagement and impact the movie could have had.
A notable aspect that sparked discussion was the portrayal of dialogues that carried a negative undertone toward Pakistan. This narrative choice invoked a polarizing response from the audience. For a segment of viewers, these dialogues resonated strongly and elicited a sense of patriotism or validation of preconceived notions. The depiction may have struck a chord with those who had certain sentiments or perspectives, leading them to connect with the film on a personal level. However, this approach also drew criticism from another segment, who felt that such portrayals perpetuated stereotypes or contributed to a divisive narrative. The ethical implications of presenting a country or culture in a particular light through cinematic dialogues are complex and open to interpretation.
The resonance of these dialogues further underscores the power of cinema as a medium for shaping public opinions and perceptions. The way in which the audience responded to this element of the film highlights the role that storytelling plays in influencing societal perspectives, potentially reinforcing existing biases or challenging them. The polarized reactions serve as a testament to the potential impact of artistic choices on a broader cultural and social scale.
Despite the dialogue's ability to evoke strong reactions, it does not overshadow the reservations many viewers had about the overall quality of the movie's plot. While the dialogues may have garnered attention, the heart of any film lies in its ability to weave a compelling, coherent, and immersive narrative. In this regard, the film failed to meet the expectations of a significant portion of its audience. The combination of unrealistic plot elements and disjointed storytelling left many feeling disconnected and dissatisfied.
Ultimately, the success of a film is often measured by its ability to strike a balance between entertainment and artistic depth. While Sunny's action sequences undoubtedly injected excitement into the film, they alone could not salvage a storyline that struggled with plausibility. The portrayal of dialogues, while impactful for some, could not compensate for the lack of narrative cohesion that hindered the movie's potential.
In the world of cinema, the interplay of action, dialogue, and plot must harmonize to create a memorable and impactful experience. This film serves as a reminder that even standout performances and resonant dialogues cannot fully compensate for a storyline that veers too far from the realm of believability. As audiences continue to engage with a diverse array of cinematic offerings, the enduring lesson lies in the enduring value of a well-crafted narrative that captures the imagination and delivers a meaningful and satisfying viewing experience.
